Down arrowContact us

Geneva

Berne

Nyon

Zurich

Paris

London

Montevideo

Home
| Disclaimer | Legal information | Site map | Down arrowSearch ...

Portfolio management

...........................

Air Liquide

Aixtron

Allianz

Aviva

BHP Billiton

BMW

Carrefour

Danone

Dassault Systemes

Delhaize Group

Deutsche Bank

France Telecom

Fresenius MC

GDF SUEZ

Gemalto

Georg Fischer

Getinge

Givaudan

HSBC

Inditex

K+S

L'Oréal

Lindt & Sprungli

LVMH

Maurel & Prom

Nestlé

Nordea

Novartis

Qiagen

Reed Elsevier

Remy Cointreau

Roche

SAP

Société Générale

St-Gobain

STMicroelectronics

Telefonica

Tomkins

Total

TUI Travel

Tullow Oil

UBS

Vallourec

Vodafone

Wolseley

WPP

Xstrata

Zurich Financial Services

Links FR | DE | ES Print

Company search

Industry search

> Qiagen

> BHP Billiton

> Tullow Oil

> Nordea

> UBS

K+S

Complete study 22 april 2010

version française

english version

12 august 2010 / EUR 42.-

K+S published Q2 2010 results ahead of expectations and raised its forecasts, BUT they are still below consensus… The market is therefore incredibly disappointed; it is reacting strongly. Investors forget that K+S does not need an immediate price rise to be generously profitable… this is exactly what motivates us to hold on to our investment in this share. PLUS code maintained.

11 may 2010 / EUR 42.28

K+S has published very strong results for Q1 2010, confirming a substantial recovery of volumes. Prospects have been reviewed in line with market expectations. The recovery trend is confirmed. Prices remain stable for the time being. But, as previously indicated, K+S does not need a price rise to return to an attractive level of profitability. PLUS code maintained.

22 april 2010 / EUR 42.75

We are introducing K+S with a new PLUS code for the following reasons: medium/long-term fundamentals on agricultural markets will require increased use of fertilizers to satisfy demand; recovery of potash volumes following the disastrous performance in 2009 and a strong leverage effect for K+S (high cost base) which was unfavourable in 2009.